In the business world , there are cases of unethical behavior that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that question the values of an organization . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , is a perfect example of the latter — a tale of presumed malfeasance that severely undermines the reputation of a solitary executive but calls into question over the enterprise’s integrity.
Despite a range of troubling accusations , Collins has held onto his title , seemingly unaffected by the furor engulfing him. How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the firm’s focus on transparency ? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of questionable behavior was initiated by breaking of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t cease there. Instead, it intensified into a pattern of misconduct that has left fellow employees demoralized and stakeholders confused .
Throughout a leadership improvement workshop— supposedly designed to boost managerial skills —David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a series of reckless events . Insiders ventia kerikeri suggest he spent business-funded trips pursuing romantic liaisons , a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s organizational standards, all while his loved ones stayed unaware .
But the impropriety didn’t stop at personal entanglements . One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a significant exploitation of professional tools and a breach of trust . His audacious engagement with Microsoft Teams to send suggestive messages —including icons to boast about infidelities —paints a picture of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly progressed his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in romantic liaisons with an employee on several instances during company hours , despite his own marital status and her having a spouse . This transparent exploitation of company time and resources broke all norms of professionalism but destroyed families —creating a trail of betrayal that extended outside of the business environment .
What reason can this behavior be permitted to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly broken every professional standard is still employed at Ventia? The explanation , it appears, is rooted in a concerning absence of supervision within the business. Complaints have been made , yet Collins acts without consequences .
This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that rank and influence within the enterprise can shield someone from repercussions . It creates a toxic work environment , demoralizes employees , and ultimately undermines the business’s ethics.